Everything You Need To Know About ZERO FIR Or Free Jurisdiction FIR - Online Legal Advise

Everything You Need To Know About ZERO FIR Or Free Jurisdiction FIR  - Online Legal Advise


To understand ZERO FIR, First it is necessary to understand what does an FIR mean.

What is FIR ?

A First Information Report (F.I.R.) is the first information in point of time regarding the commission of a cognizable offence that is given to the police and is recorded in the manner provided under section 154 of the Cr.P.C.

It is generally a complaint lodged with the police by the victim of a cognizable
offence or by someone on his or her behalf, but anyone can make such a report either orally or in writing to the police.


By whom FIR can be filled ?

Any person who has knowledge about the commission of a cognizable offence may register an F.I.R. with the police. Such person may be:

1. The victim of the offence, or
2. a family member of the victim, or
3. a witness to the offence, or
4. the person who has committed the offence, or
5. a police officer, or
6. any other person who has come to know about such offence.

An F.I.R. may also be registered under the order of a Magistrate. For example, if any woman files a complaint before the Magistrate that her husband is harassing her for dowry. If the Magistrate forwards the complaint to the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station without taking cognizance, then the officer should register an F.I.R. and then investigate the case (Cr.P.C. section 156 (3)).

Contents of FIR

Every FIR has serial no, date of occurrence, time of occurrence, place of occurrence, contents of complaint etc. and it is lodged because of commission of cognizable offence (an offence in which police can take suo motu action and no prior approval from court is required). 

Every police station has jurisdictional area for which they can take up the investigation if commission of cognizable offence area found under their jurisdiction. For example,  if someone's phone is theft at Bus stand of LalQuila , Delhi then the police station whose under LalQuila come will lodge such persons FIR and investigate it.

What is ZERO FIR ?

The concept of Zero FIR is a free jurisdiction FIR. The provision of Zero FIR came up as a recommendation in Justice Verma Committee Report in the new Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 after the heinous Nirbhaya case of December 2012. The provision says:

" A FIR can be filed at any police station irrespective of place of crime and area of jurisdiction. This provision is for everyone. When in trouble Men and women will be benefited equally. "

In Zero FIR, any police station can register FIR irrespective of jurisdictional area but the investigation will be taken up the police in which place of occurrence reported in FIR. The police station registers the zero FIR marking it serial no. zero and transfer to the competent jurisdictional area which can carry out the investigation. The sanctity of legal process remains same in Zero FIR.

It is very helpful for people as it facilitate them by not allowing making rounds of different police station for lodging the FIR.

A Zero FIR can be filed in any police station by the victim, irrespective of their residence or crime place. Even if you are away from the place of incident or are unaware of the right jurisdiction, you can successfully file an FIR in any police
station. This type of FIR is termed as a Zero FIR.

What can be done if police refuses to file ZERO FIR ?

In many cases it happens that the police officers deny to acknowledge a Zero FIR and also try to convince the victim and his family to approach the concerned police station for registering the FIR rather than trying to help them.

Many of us do not know that according to Section 166A of the Indian Penal Code added by Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, a police officer refusing to register FIRs related to certain offences against women (such as rape, molestation, etc.) can be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with a fine or with both.


A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Govt.of UP and Others (2008) 7 SCC 164 has issued the following guidelines:-

a) The registration of FIR is mandatory under section 154 of CrPC, if the information discloses commission of a cognizance offence.

b) The police officer cannot avoid his duty of registering offence if cognizable offence is disclosed. Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

c) Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

The Supreme Court in Bimla Rawal and Others Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another 2008 II AD Delhi 188 has held:-

“It is clear that the law is that police can register an FIR of commission of a cognizable crime but after registration of FIR, if on scrutiny or investigation, it is found that crime was not committed within the jurisdiction of that Police Station but was committed within the jurisdiction of some other Police Station, the FIR should be transferred to that Police Station."

" However, if at the time of registration of FIR itself, it is apparent on the face of it that crime was committed outside the jurisdiction of the Police Station, the Police after registration of FIR should transfer the FIR to that Police Station for investigation. Normally a ‘Zero’ FIR is registered by Police in such cases and after registration of FIR, the FIR is transferred to the concerned Police Station.”


How to File a ZERO FIR ?

1. Like all regular FIRs, a Zero FIR can be filed in accordance to the below mentioned procedure. 

2. Statement will be recorded by the police officer in writing.

3. All details, without any speculation or assumption should be provided to the police during the statement.

4. Make the statement official by signing the register.

5. Get a copy of your complaint and ask for the identification number or Roll is not provided. 

When to use a ZERO FIR ?

The main idea of a Zero FIR is to initiate the investigation or urge the police to take their initial action. Once you have lodged a Zero FIR, make sure that your complaint is not transferred to the appropriate police station in your jurisdiction without any initial action or investigation. Crimes like murder, rape and accidents require immediate action from the concerned police authorities so that they take appropriate samples, eye witnesses and other circumstantial details. Zero FIR allows the authorities to pen down the initial action taken rather than trying to figure out what had happened at the crime scene initially. 

Important Case laws on ZERO FIR

In the case of Satvinder Kaur vs. State (Government of NCT Delhi), The complainant had appealed in the Supreme Court against the order of the High Court, where the High Court had quashed the FIR filed at Delhi Police Station by the complainant. The Supreme Court held that, Police can investigate the case, which does not fall under their jurisdiction.

In the case of Bimla Rawal and Ors.v State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr 2008 II AD Delhi 188, FIR was lodged in Delhi, despite the fact that all incidents occurred in Mumbai. Writ Petition was filed in Supreme Court regarding the mala fide intentions of police succumbing under the pressure of opposite. 

Impact of ZERO FIR

A famous example of Zero FIR is Aasaram Bapu rape case. In the FIR, the place of occurence of offence falls under the jurisdiction of Jodhpur, Rajasthan but the Police Station Kamla Market, Delhi registered the FIR, then transferred it to Jodhpur, for further investigation. Then Jodhpur police taken up the investigation.


References :

1.https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.droitpenaleiljcc.in/PDF/V1I1/10.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjJ58uJ-arbAhUVfn0KHfsUA1kQFjAAegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw23_bIDVb9wDI37MQAqek_o


Share:

Whether Six Months Waiting Period In Section 13B(2) Of Hindu Marriage Act For Divorce By Mutual Consent is Mandatory ? Detailed Discussion With Landmark Judgements

Whether Six Months Waiting Period In Section 13B(2) Of Hindu Marriage Act For Divorce By Mutual Consent is Mandatory ? Detailed Discussion With Landmark Judgements


In this article we will discuss:

1. Whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act) for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or can be relaxed in any exceptional situations ? and

2. Whether exercise of power under Article 142 to waive the statutory period under Section 13B of the Act was appropriate ?



To answer these questions it is necessary to cite the provision of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

“13-B. Divorce by mutual consent -  (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred  to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.”

Now, Regarding the first question it can be said that it is now well settled that the waiting period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations.

This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. Omprakash vs. K. Nalini AIR 1986 AP 167, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy AIR 1994 Kar 12, Delhi High Court in Dhanjit Vadra vs. Smt. Beena Vadra AIR 1990 Del 146 and Madhya Pradesh High Court in Dinesh Kumar Shukla vs. Smt. Neeta AIR 2005 MP 106

The Supreme Court in a very recent case  (Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11158 OF 2017) considered the above question in detail and held that the period mentioned in Section 13B(2) is not mandatory but directory and it will be open to the Court to exercise its discretion in the facts and circumstances of each case where there is no possibility of parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation.

In this case the Supreme Court observed that

" The object of the provision is to enable the parties to dissolve a marriage by consent if the marriage has irretrievably broken down and to enable them to rehabilitate them as per available options."

" The object of the cooling off the period was to safeguard against a hurried decision if there was otherwise possibility of differences being reconciled."

" The object was not to perpetuate a purposeless marriage or to prolong the agony of the parties when there was no chance of reconciliation. Though every effort has to be made to save a marriage, if there are no chances of reunion and there are chances of fresh rehabilitation, the Court should not be powerless in enabling the parties to have a better option."



On the basis of its observation the Supreme Court issued following guidelines in this regard :

" where the Court dealing with a matter is satisfied that a case is made out to waive the statutory period under Section 13B(2), it can do so after considering the following :

1. the statutory period of six months specified in Section 13B(2), in addition to the statutory period of one year under Section 13B(1) of separation of parties is already over before the first motion itself;

2. all efforts for mediation/conciliation including efforts in terms of Order XXXIIA Rule 3 CPC/Section 23(2) of the Act/Section 9 of the Family Courts Act to reunite the parties have failed and there is no likelihood of success in that direction by any further efforts;

3. the parties have genuinely settled their differences including alimony, custody of child or any other pending issues between the parties;

4. the waiting period will only prolong their agony.

The waiver application can be filed one week after the first motion giving reasons for the prayer for waiver.

If the above conditions are satisfied, the waiver of the waiting period for the second motion will be in the discretion of the concerned Court. "

Thus cooling off period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations.

Now regarding the second question i.e., whether exercise of power under Article 142 to waive the statutory period under Section 13B of the Act was appropriate ? There is controversy in the judgements of the Supreme Court itself

In Anjana Kishore versus Puneet Kishore (2002) 10 SCC 194 the Supreme Court was dealing with a transfer petition and the parties reached a settlement. The Court waived the six months period under Article 142 in the facts and circumstances of the case.

In Romesh Chander v. Savitri (1995)2 SCC 7; Kiran v. Sharad Dutt (2000)10 SCC 243; Sanghamitra Ghosh v. Kajal Kumar Ghosh (2007) 2 SCC 220; Rishikesh Sharma v. Saroj Sharma (2007) 2 SCC 263; Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh (2007) 4 SCC 511 and Satish Sitole v. Ganga (2008) 7 SCC 73 The Supreme Court held that power under Article 142 had been exercised in cases where the Court found the marriage to be totally unworkable, emotionally dead, beyond salvage and broken down irretrievably. This power was also exercised to put quietus to all litigations and to save the parties from further agony. This view was reiterated in Poonam versus Sumit Tanwar (2010) 4 SCC 460.


However in Manish Goel versus Rohini Goel (2010) 4 SCC 393, a Bench of two-Judges of Supreme Court held that jurisdiction of this Court under Article 142 could not be used to waive the statutory period of six months for filing the second motion under Section 13B, as doing so will be passing an order in contravention of a statutory provision.



But without any reference to the judgment in Manish Goel,  power under Article 142 of the Constitution has been exercised by the Supreme Court in number of cases, even after the said judgment.(Priyanka Khanna v. Amit Khanna (2011) 15 SCC 612; Devinder Singh Narula v. Meenakshi Nangia (2012) 8 SCC 580; Vimi Vinod Chopra v. Vinod Gulshan Chpra (2013) 15 SCC 547; Priyanka Chawla v. Amit Chawla (2016) 3 SCC 126; Nikhil Kumar v. Rupali Kumar (2016) 13 SCC 383)

This controversy is resolved by the Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11158 OF 2017) wherein the Supreme Court held that

 " we are of the view that since Manish Goel holds the field, in absence of contrary decision by a larger Bench, power under Article 142 of the Constitution cannot be exercised contrary to the statutory provisions, especially when no proceedings are pending before this Court and this Court is approached only for the purpose of waiver of the statute."

Answer of both the questions is thus given.


Share:

27 Stages Of Criminal Cases In India Under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973

27 Stages Of Criminal Cases In India Under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973

Different stages of criminal cases in India are :-
A. Pre-trial stage
B. Trial stage
C. Post-trial stage



Now, each stage requires some steps to be fulfilled they are :-
A. Pre-trial Stage

1. Commission of an offence (cognizable or non cognizable)

2.  A. Information to police.
     B. Complaint to magistrate.

A. Information to police :-

  a. Information of cognizable offence.
  b. Information of non cognizable offence.

a. Information of cognizable offence :-

Under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a FIR or First Information Report is registered. FIR puts the case into motion. A FIR is information given by someone (aggrieved) to the police relating to the commitment of an offense.

b. Information of non cognizable offence :-

In case of non cognizable offence N.C.R (non cognizable report) is registered by police under section 155 of Cr.P.C. but the police cannot start investigation or arrest the accused without the order of a Magistrate having power to try such case.

B. Complaint to magistrate - Section 2 (d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure defines the term ‘complaint’ as any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.

On receipt of a complaint a Magistrate has several courses open to him. 

He may take cognizance of the offence and proceed to record the statements of the complainant and the witnesses present under Section 200, Cr PC.  

Thereafter if in his opinion there is no sufficient ground for proceeding he may dismiss the complaint under Section 203, Cr PC. If in his opinion there is sufficient ground for proceeding he may issue process under Section 204, Cr PC. 

However, if he thinks fit, he may postpone the issue of process and either inquire into the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by a police officer or such other person as he thinks fit for the purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding (Section 202, Cr PC). 

He may then issue process if in his opinion there is sufficient ground for proceeding or dismiss the complaint if there is no sufficient ground for proceeding.

3. 
Investigation by Police :- Police conduct investigation for

  •       For collection of evidence;
  •       Interrogation/ statement of accused;
  •       Statement of witnesses;
  •       Scientific analysis / opinion if required.
During this time, at any stage decided by investigating agency, accused persons can be arrested. 

In case of cognizable offence police can start investigation after the registration of FIR, no prior approval of magistrate is necessary. But in case of non cognizable offence, prior approval of magistrate is necessary to start investigation. 


4. Anticipatory Bail :- Upon registration of FIR for cognizable criminal offence the accused may make an application for anticipatory bail in session court or high court. If anticipatory bail is granted then the accused cannot be arrested. If anticipatory bail is rejected then the accused can be arrested without warrant. 

5. Arrest of the accused :-
 In case of cognizable offence police can arrest the accused without warrant. However in case of non cognizable offence prior approval of magistrate is necessary. 

6. Production of accused to magistrate :-
 Within 24 hours of the arrest the accused shall be produced before a magistrate having jurisdiction to try such cases. 

7. Remand :-
 Whenever an accused is arrested for any offence and police cannot complete investigation within 24 hours then such person is produced before a magistrate for seeking extension of police or magisterial custody.

8. After investigation is completed:- If investigating agency feels a prima facie case is made out, charge sheet is filed in Court through the public prosecutor. If police feels that no prima facie case is made out, a final report filed in Court.


9. Cognizance of Offence by Magistrate :- After filling of charge sheet the next stage is taking cognizance of offence by magistrate under section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In the language of the Hon’ble Apex Court employed in its earliest decision  R.R.Chari v. State of U.P AIR 1951 SC 207 “taking cognizance does not involve any formal action or indeed action of any kind but occurs as soon as a Magistrate as such applies his mind to the suspected commission of offence”

10. Service of summons/warrant to accused and Process to compel appearance under chapter 6 of Cr.P.C.

11. Appearance of accused before court & engagement of advocate.

12. Filing bail application/ furnishing surety.

13. Decision is taken by the Court after hearing the public prosecutor and the counsel for defence: 

A. On question of Charge sheet:- 

a. Court can reject charge sheet, in which case the accused is discharged. Or, 

b. Court can accept that a prima facie case is made out, frame the charges, and post the case for trial. Case goes to next stage.

B. On Final Report:-

a. Court can accept the final report- case is closed and accused is discharged. Or,  

b. Court can reject the final report, and direct the police to further investigate the case. Case goes back to the Stage of investigation. Or, 

c. If the Court direct the case to be posted for trial. Case goes to next stage. 

14. Framing Of Charge :-  After considering the police report and other important documents the accused is not discharged then the court frames charges under which he is to be trialed.

15. Conviction on plea of guilty :- If the accused pleads guilty, the court shall record the plea and may, at discretion convicts the accused. 

16. If the accused pleads not guilty. Case is posted for trial. 

B. Trial stage

17. Commencement of trial
 - Generally speaking trial of a case commences when the case is posted for examination of witnesses. Trial may be - 
a. Sessions trial
b. Warrant trial
c. Summons trial
d. Summary trial



18. Prosecution evidence:- After the charges are framed, and the accused pleads guilty, then the court requires the prosecution to produce evidence to prove the guilt of the accused. The prosecution is required to support their evidence with statements from its witnesses. This process is called “examination in chief”. The magistrate has the power to issue summons to any person as a witness or orders him to produce any document.

19. Statement of the accused:- Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code gives an opportunity to the accused to be heard and explain the facts and circumstances of the case. The statements of accused are not recorded under oath and can be used against him in the trial.

20. Defence evidence:- An opportunity is given to the accused in a case where he is not being acquitted to produce so as to defend his case. The defense can produce both oral and documentary evidence. In India, since the burden of proof is on the prosecution the defense, in general, is not required to give any defense evidence.

21. Final Arguments:-  Public Prosecutor and the defence counsel present their arguments. 

22. Judgment and sentence by the Court:- The final decision of the court with reasons given in support of the acquittal or conviction of the accused is known as judgment. 



23. Arguments on sentence:- When the accused is convicted, then both sides are invited to give arguments on the punishment which is to be awarded. This is usually done when the person is convicted of an offense whose punishment is life imprisonment or capital punishment.

However when the sentence is pronounced in a summons case, the parties need not argue on the amount of punishment given. The sentence is the sole discretion of the judge.

24. Judgment of Court passing sentence:- After the arguments on sentence, the court finally decides what should be the punishment for the accused. While punishing a person, the courts consider various theories of punishment like reformative theory of punishment and deterrent theory of punishment. Court also considers the age, background and history of an accused and the judgment is pronounced accordingly.

C. Post-trial stage

25. Appeal (within specified period of limitation)/Revision :- Appeal can be filed by party aggrieved by judgment on acquittal/ conviction/sentence.

On notice being issued to the opposite parties, arguments are placed before Appellate court by defence counsel and the public prosecutor. Or,

Revision Application :-

Where there is right of appeal provided but no appeal was filed then in its discretion the Sessions Court or the High Court can entertain a revision to prevent miscarriage of Justice occurred by the orders of the lower court. 

26. Judgment of the Appellate Court or Court having revisional jurisdiction.

27. Execution of sentence. 


References :- 

1.https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/blog.ipleaders.in/all-about-the-various-stages-of-criminal-trial-in-india/amp/

2.https://www.lawfarm.in/blogs/process-of-criminal-trial-and-proceedings-in-india.

3.http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/mobile/experts/details.asp?mod_id=84286





Share:

18 Stages of Divorce Proceedings In India - Step by Step Process And Procedure Of Contested Divorce In India

18 Stages of Divorce Proceedings In India - Step by Step Process And Procedure Of Contested Divorce In India


There are various laws relating to Marriage and Divorce in India -

1. For Hindus, the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2. For Christians, the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872

3. For Muslims, the Dissolution of Marriage Act, 1939 and the Muslim Women(Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986

4. For Parsis, the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936.

5. The Special Marriage Act, 1954



Contested Divorce - A contested divorce is filed when one of the spouses decide to divorce the other without his/her consent.

In India a contested divorce can be filled on the basis of the following grounds namely -
1. Cruelty
2. Adultery
3. Desertion
4. Leprosy
5. Venereal disease
6. Mental disorder
7. Acceptance of religious order on renouncing the world
8. Respondent not heard of being alive for seven years.
9. Conversion to some other religion
10. Sentence of imprisonment for seven years
11. No resumption of cohabitation. etc.,

Application of Civil Procedure Code in Matrimonial proceedings - Subject to the provisions of the respective statutes and to such rules as may be framed by the High Courts all proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act (vide section 21), Indian Divorce Act (vide section 45) and under the Special Marriage Act (vide section 40), shall be regulated as far as may be by the Code of Civil Procedure.

18 Stages of Divorce Proceedings In India - Step by Step Process and Procedure of Contested Divorce In India :-

There are several processes and procedure from filing the case to obtain a decree as follows -

1. Filing of the petition by the applicant (Petitioner) in proper Court.

2. When a petition for divorce is based on the ground of respondent’s adultery, then the alleged adulterer or adulteress should be made a party to the petition and he or she may intervene in the proceedings

3. Service of summons to the respondent (the other spouse).

4. Appearance of parties on the date fixed.

5. Ex parte decree of divorce, if despite opportunity respondent fails to appear before the Court.

6. Written statement of the respondent in reply to the summons is to file in the Court duly, verified and sworn with affidavit.

7. Reconciliation efforts are done by the court.

8. Production of documents by Parties (Petitioner and respondent)

9. Examination of Parties

10. Admission

11. Ancillary proceedings (alimony pendente lite and expenses of proceedings, custody of children, if any)

12. Stay of proceedings if the petitioner against whom an order for interim maintenance has been made does not comply with that order.

13. Issues for consideration determined by the court.

14. Summoning and attendance of witnesses.

15. Recording of the evidence of the petitioner, respondent and witnesses.

16. Argument

17. Orders of Judgment by the court

18. Drawing of a decree.



The detailed discussion of all the stages are given below.

1. Filing of a petition for divorce :- A divorce starts with a divorce petition. The petition is written by one spouse (the petitioner). The petition is then filed in a district court.


2. Co- respondent and intervener :- It has been laid down in high court rules that when a petition for divorce is based on the ground of respondent’s adultery, then the alleged adulterer or adulteress should be made a party to the petition, unless the alleged adulterer or adulteress is dead or his or her name is not known to the petitioner or for any reason the court considers that he or she need not be made a co-respondent, and he or she may intervene in the proceedings.

If in the written statement the respondent makes allegations of adultery on the part of petitioner with a named person, then a certified copy of such allegations must be served on that person and he or she may intervene in the proceedings.

3. Service of summons to the respondent :- After completion of office note, the notice is issued to the respondent to appear in the Court. The notice in Registered Post is sent to the
respondent and if the respondent does not respond, then it is advertised in the newspaper under order 5 Rule XX of C.P.C. If the husband is the respondent the notice is stuck outside his door, in case it could not be handed over to him personally.

After the suit has been instituted it is necessary that the summons must be issued to the respondent and the respondent is required to file written statement within a period of thirty days from the date when summons were served. If the respondent has appeared and admitted Petitioners claim then summons are not required to be served. Further, if the respondent is unable to file the written
statement within this period, then the person can file it on such other day as is fixed by the court but it shall not be later than ninety days from the date of service of summons and it is also necessary that the court must record it in writing.

4. Appearance of parties :- On the day fixed in the summons the respondent is required to appear and answer and the parties shall attend the court unless the hearing is adjourned to a future day fixed by the court, if the respondent is absent court may proceed exparte. Where on the day so fixed it is found that summons has not been served upon respondent is consequence of failure of Petitioner to pay the court fee or postal charges the court may dismiss the suit. Where neither the plaintiff nor the  respondent appears the court may dismiss the suit. Such dismissal does not bar fresh suit in respect of same cause of action.

5. Ex parte decree of divorce :- In view of Order 8, rule 5(2) , C.P.C. it is lawful for the court to at once pronounce ex parte judgment except against one under disability,  if despite opportunity respondent files no written statement.

But in matrimonial proceedings this rule is hardly applicable, for the Matrimonial law ordains that even where it is proved that any one of the grounds for granting any relief exists the judge has to satisfy himself that the petitioner is not in any way taking advantage of his or her own wrong or disability for the purpose of such relief and has not been in any manner accessory to or connived at or condoned the act of adultery or acts complained of that there is no collusion between the parties or that there has not been any unnecessary or improper delay instituting the proceeding and lastly, that there is no other legal ground why relief should not be granted. A judge cannot properly do so without personally examining the petitioner, more particularly in an undefended case.

6. Written statement :-  a written statement is the pleading
Of the respondent wherein he deals with every material fact alleged by the Petitioner in his plaint and also states any new facts in his favour or take legal objections against the claim of the Petitioner.

It is essential that the denial must be specific. It shall not be sufficient for the defendant in his written statement to deny generally the grounds alleged by the Petitioner, but the
respondent must deny specifically with each allegation off act of which he does not admit the truth.

Further allegation of fact in the plaint, if not denied specifically or by  necessary implication, or stated to be not admitted in the pleadings of the respondent, shall be taken to be admitted except against a person under disability.




7. Reconciliation :- Before proceeding to grant any relief under this Act, it. shall be the duty of the court in the first instance, in every case where it is possible, so to do consistently with the nature and circumstances of the case, to make every endeavor to bring about a reconciliation between the parties. (vide section 34(2), Special Marriage Act, section 23(2), Hindu Marriage Act)

Attempt of reconciliation however is not to be made when a petition for divorce under is grounded on either of the following grounds namely,
a. respondent's apostacy
b. respondent's unsoundness of mind
c. leprosy of the respondent
d. venereal disease of the respondent
e. that the respondent has renounced the world by entering any religious order.
f. that the respondent has not been heard of as being alive for a period of seven years or more by those persons who would naturally have heard of it, had the party been alive.
g. the respondent is undergoing a sentence of imprisonment for seven years or more for an offence as defined in the Indian Penal Code

8.Production of documents by Parties :- After filing of written statement by the respondent the next stage is production of documents. The parties or their pleaders shall produce all documentary evidence of every description in their possession or power, on which they intend to rely, and which has not been filed in the court or ordered to be produced.

9. Examination of parties :- Examination of parties is an important stage after appearance. At first hearing of the suit the court shall ascertain from each party or his pleader whether he admits or denies such allegations of fact as are made in the plaint or written statement. Such admissions and denials shall be recorded. The examination may be an oral examination. When a party, if the pleader of the party who appears,  refuses or is unable to answer any material question court may direct the concerned party should remain present in the court. If the party does not remain present court may pass such orders as deemed fit.

10. Admission :- Order XII of CPC deals with admissions. It provides that If any of the parties to the suit, admits partially or whole of the case of the other side, then the party is required to give notice in writing that he/she admits the case partially or fully as the case may be.

on the basis of the admission of the parties, the court may pronounce judgment either on its own or on the basis of the application made by either party without waiting for determination of any other question between the parties.

11. Ancillary proceedings :- In matrimonial cases two subsidiary proceedings, one relating to children and the other relating to maintenance of parties, often arise, either during the pendency of proceedings, or at the time of the passing of the decree. Till 1958 in English law these proceedings were known as ancillary proceedings.

A. Alimony pendente lite and expenses of proceedings :- The power of the court of ordering alimony pendente lite in a pending proceeding for matrimonial relief has been provided for, by Section 24,  Hindu Marriage Act; section 36, Indian Divorce Act; section 36 Special Marriage Act and section 39, Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act. But section 24, Hindu Marriage Act has a peculiar feature. There the relief has been extended to spouse of either sex, that is to say in appropriate case a husband too can claim alimony pendente lite. If the applicant has no independent means, he or she is entitled to interim maintenance and expenses unless good cause is shown for depriving him or her of it.

B. Custody of children :- The question of custody of children has been dealt with in section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, section 38 of the Special Marriage Act, sections 41 to 44 of the Indian Divorce Act. Disruption of marital relations between the spouses is fraught with grave consequences to the welfare of the minor children and accordingly provisions have been made for safeguarding their interest and welfare. The relevant sections contemplate minor children only. The district court has been the power under this section to pass interim orders from time to time during the pendency of proceedings before it with respect to the custody, maintenance and education of minor children, consistently with their wishes.

12. Stay of proceedings :- In some situations in the matrimonial petition, stay of proceedings may be sought by either spouse. The Hindu Marriage Act or the High Court Rules do not contain any provision in this regard, but stay of proceedings may be obtained under Section 10 read with Order 41, Rules 5 and 6 C.P.C. as well as under the inherent jurisdiction of the court under section 151, C.P.C. We have already seen that if the petitioner against whom an order for interim maintenance has been made does not comply with it, the court has power to stay the proceedings.


13. Framing of Issues :- Order XIV of C.P.C deals with settlement of issues. Issues arise when a material proposition of fact or law is affirmed by one party, and denied by the other. Material-proposition are those propositions of law or fact which a Petitioner must allege in order to show a right to sue or a respondent must allege in order to constitute his defense. Each material proposition affirmed by one party and denied by the other shall form the subject matter of a distinct issue. It is for the court to frame issues properly. Court is required to pronounce judgment on all the issues.



14. Summoning and attendance of witnesses :- After issues are framed, a stage has reached, when the parties to the suit are in a position to know what facts and what documents should be proved by them. Any party to the proceedings may apply to the court that summons should be served to all those persons whom he wants to be his witness. A list of witnesses should be provided in the court by the party to the proceedings whom they propose to call as witnesses either to give evidence or to produce documents. It shall not be later than fifteen days after the date on which the issues are settled.

15. Hearing of Suits and Examination of Witnesses :- The Petitioner is entitled to have first right to begin unless the defendant
admits the facts alleged by the Petitioner and contends that either in point of law or on some additional facts alleged by the defendant the Petitioner is not entitled to any part of relief. In such case respondent has the right to begin.

The Petitioner has to state his case in front of the judge. The plaintiff has to submit the evidence that was earlier marked. Then the Petitioner will be Cross examined by the respondent's lawyer. The witness from the Petitioner side also have to appear in the Court, who are also cross examined by the respondent's lawyer.

Then the respondent present his side of the story supported by his witnesses and evidence. The Petitioner's lawyer will then cross examine the respondent and his witnesses.

16. Argument :- As soon as evidence of both side is over then the suit is kept for argument. Once the evidence has been submitted and cross examination was conducted by the Petitioner and respondent, both sides are allowed to present a summary of their case and evidence to the judge in the final argument session.

17. Judgment :- “A judgment may be said to be ‘the final decision of the court intimated to the parties and the world at large by formal ‘pronouncement’ or ‘delivery’ in open court.”

After the hearing is complete, it is necessary that the judgment should be pronounced. The judgment should usually contain (1) the concise statement of the case (2) the points for determination (3) the decision thereon. (4) the reasons for such decision. The last paragraph of the judgment should contain the relief granted.

The judgment shall be dated and signed by the judge in the open court. Once it is signed, it shall not be altered afterwards except (i) to correct clerical or arithmetical mistakes, or errors due to accidental slips or omissions (section 152); or (ii) or review (section 114).

Within fifteen days from the date of judgment decree should be drawn.



18. Decree :- The decree shall agree with the judgment; it shall contain the number of the suit, the names and descriptions of the parties, their registered addresses, and particulars of the claim and shall specify clearly the relief granted or other determination of the suit. In divorce proceedings the district court at the time of passing decree entitled to make provision for permanent alimony and maintenance, custody of children, disposal of property presented, at or about the time of marriage, which may belong jointly to both the husband and the wife.

So, this is the step by step process and procedure for getting a divorce in India. 






Share:

Multiple Khoj

Search This Blog

Popular Posts

Labels

Like Our Facebook Page

Recent Posts