Various Stages Of Criminal Proceedings In India Under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973



Various Stages Of Criminal Proceedings In India Under Criminal Procedure Code, 1973


Various stages of criminal Proceedings in India are :-
A. Pre-trial stage
B. Trial stage
C. Post-trial stage



Now, each stage requires some steps to be fulfilled they are :-

A. Pre-trial Stage
                                                
1. Commission of an offence (cognizable or non cognizable)

2 A. Information to police.
     B. Complaint to magistrate.

A. Information to police :-

  a. Information of cognizable offence.
  b. Information of non cognizable offence.

a. Information of cognizable offence :-

Under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a FIR or First Information Report is registered. FIR puts the case into motion. A First Information Report (F.I.R.) is the first information in point of time regarding the commission of a cognizable offence that is given to the police and is recorded in the manner provided under section 154 of the Cr.P.C.

An F.I.R. may also be registered under the order of a Magistrate. For example, Meena files a complaint before the Magistrate that her husband is harassing her for dowry. If the Magistrate forwards the complaint to the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station without taking cognizance, then the officer should register an F.I.R. and then investigate the case (Cr.P.C., Section 156 (3)

b. Information of non cognizable offence :-

In case of non cognizable offence N.C.R (non cognizable report) is registered by police under section 155 of Cr.P.C. but the police cannot start investigation or arrest the accused without the order of a Magistrate having power to try such case.

B. Complaint to magistrate - Section 2 (d) of the Code of Criminal Procedure defines the term ‘complaint’ as any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Code, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report.

On receipt of a complaint a Magistrate has several courses open to him.

He may take cognizance of the offence and proceed to record the statements of the complainant and the witnesses present under Section 200, Cr PC.



Thereafter if in his opinion there is no sufficient ground for proceeding he may dismiss the complaint under Section 203, Cr PC. If in his opinion there is sufficient ground for proceeding he may issue process under Section 204, Cr PC.

However, if he thinks fit, he may postpone the issue of process and either inquire into the case himself or direct an investigation to be made by a police officer or such other person as he thinks fit for the purpose of deciding whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding (Section 202, Cr PC).

He may then issue process if in his opinion there is sufficient ground for proceeding or dismiss the complaint if there is no sufficient ground for proceeding.

3. Investigation by Police :- Police conduct investigation for

•       For collection of evidence;
•       Interrogation/ statement of accused;
•       Statement of witnesses;
•       Scientific analysis / opinion if required.

During this time, at any stage decided by investigating agency, accused persons can be arrested.

In case of cognizable offence police can start investigation after the registration of FIR, no prior approval of magistrate is necessary. But in case of non cognizable offence, prior approval of magistrate is necessary to start investigation.


4. Anticipatory Bail :- Upon registration of FIR for cognizable criminal offence the accused may make an application for anticipatory bail in session court or high court under section 438 of Cr.P.C. If anticipatory bail is granted then the accused cannot be arrested. If anticipatory bail is rejected then the accused can be arrested without warrant.

5. Arrest of the accused :- In case of cognizable offence police can arrest the accused without warrant. However in case of non cognizable offence police has no authority to arrest without warrant.

6. Production of accused to magistrate :- Within 24 hours of the arrest the accused shall be produced before a magistrate having jurisdiction to try such cases.

Section 57 of the Cr.P.C  provides that “ No police officer shall detain in custody a person arrested without warrant for a longer period than under all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, and such period shall not, in the absence of a special order of a Magistrate under section 167, exceed twenty- four hours exclusive of the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the Magistrate' s Court.”



7. Remand/Bail :- Whenever an accused is arrested for any offence and police cannot complete investigation within 24 hours then such person is produced before a magistrate for seeking extension of custody.

The magistrate considering the application can grant Police Custody to the accused which shall not be more than fifteen days in the whole.

However, If the magistrate does not deems it proper to grant police custody then the accused is taken in Magisterial Custody.

Proviso (a)  to sub-section (2) of section 167 provides that " The Magistrate may authorise the detention of the accused person, otherwise than in the custody of the police, beyond the period of fifteen days; if he is satisfied that adequate grounds exist for doing so, but no Magistrate shall authorise the detention of the accused person in custody under this paragraph for a total period exceeding,- 

1. Ninety days,
 where the investigation relates to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years;

2. Sixty days,
 where the investigation relates to any other offence. 


on the expiry of the said period of ninety days, or sixty days, as the case may be, the accused person shall be released on bail if he is prepared to and does furnish bail. An accused can apply for grant of Bail, within the provisions of section 436, 437 and 439 of Cr.P.C.

8. After investigation is completed:- If investigating agency feels a prima facie case is made out, charge sheet is filed in Court through the public prosecutor (section 173). If police feels that no prima facie case is made out, a final report filed in Court (section 173).


9. Cognizance of Offence by Magistrate :- After filling of charge sheet the next stage is taking cognizance of offence by magistrate under section 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

In the language of the Hon’ble Apex Court employed in its earliest decision in R.R.Chari v. State of U.P AIR 1951 SC 207 “taking cognizance does not involve any formal action or indeed action of any kind but occurs as soon as a Magistrate as such applies his mind to the suspected commission of offence.”

Section 193 provides that no Court of Session shall take cognizance of any offence as a Court of original jurisdiction unless the case has been committed to it by a Magistrate under this Code.

10. Service of summons/warrant to accused and Process to compel appearance under chapter 6 of Cr.P.C.

11. Appearance of accused before court & engagement of advocate.

12. Filing bail application/ furnishing surety, if bail has not been taken earlier.

13. Decision is taken by the Court after hearing the public prosecutor and the counsel for defence:

A. On question of Charge sheet:-

a. Court can reject charge sheet, in which case the accused is discharged. Or,

b. Court can accept that a prima facie case is made out, frame the charges, and post the case for trial. Case goes to next stage.

B. On Final Report:-

a. Court can accept the final report- case is closed and accused is discharged. Or,

b. Court can reject the final report, and direct the police to further investigate the case. Case goes back to the Stage of investigation. Or,

c. If the Court direct the case to be posted for trial. Case goes to next stage.



14. Framing Of Charge :-  After considering the police report and other important documents the accused is not discharged then the court frames charges under which he is to be trialed.

In sessions trial (under section 228) and warrant trial (under section 240), the charges should be framed in writing. The charge shall then be read and explained to the accused and he shall be asked whether he pleads guilty of the offence charged or claimed to be tried


In summons trial (under section 251) the Magistrate would orally state the facts of the offense the accused is answerable. The Magistrate after stating the facts of the offense shall ask the accused if he pleads guilty or has any defense to support his case. 


15. Conviction on plea of guilty :- If the accused pleads guilty, the court shall record the plea and may, at discretion convicts the accused.(under section 229 for sessions trial, section 241 for warrant trial and section 252 for summons trial)

16. If the accused pleads not guilty. Case is posted for trial. (under section 230 for sessions trial, section 242(1) for warrant trial and section 254(1) for summonns trial)

B. Trial stage

17. Commencement of trial - Generally speaking trial of a case commences when the case is posted for examination of witnesses. Trial may be -
a. Sessions trial (Section 225 - 237)
b. Warrant trial (Section 238 - 250)
c. Summons trial (Section 251 - 259)
d. Summary trial (Section 260 - 265)



18. Prosecution evidence:- After the charges are framed, and the accused pleads guilty, then the court requires the prosecution to produce evidence to prove the guilt of the accused. The prosecution is required to support their evidence with statements from its witnesses. This process is called “examination in chief”. The magistrate has the power to issue summons to any person as a witness or orders him to produce any document. (See Section 231 for sessions trial , Section 242 for warrant trial and 254 of Cr.P.C for summonns trial)

19. Statement of the accused:- Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code gives an opportunity to the accused to be heard and explain the facts and circumstances of the case. The statements of accused are not recorded under oath and can be used against him in the trial.

20. Defence evidence:- An opportunity is given to the accused in a case where he is not being acquitted to produce so as to defend his case. The defense can produce both oral and documentary evidence. (under section 233 for sessions trial, section 243 for warrant trial, section 254(2) for summonns trial)

In India, since the burden of proof is on the prosecution the defense, in general, is not required to give any defense evidence.

21. Final Arguments:-  Public Prosecutor and the defence counsel present their arguments.

Section 314 of Cr.P.C. provides that " Any  party to a proceeding may, as soon as may be, after the close of his evidence, address concise oral arguments, and may, before he concludes the oral arguments, if any, submit a memorandum to the Court setting forth concisely and under distinct headings, the arguments in support of his case and every such memorandum shall form part of the record." 

A copy of every such memorandum shall be simultaneously furnished to the opposite party.



22. Judgment and sentence by the Court:- The final decision of the court with reasons given in support of the acquittal or conviction of the accused is known as judgment. (Under Section 235 for sessions trial, Section 248 for warrant trial, Section 255 for summonns trial)

23. Arguments on sentence:- When the accused is convicted, then both sides are invited to give arguments on the punishment which is to be awarded. This is usually done when the person is convicted of an offense whose punishment is life imprisonment or capital punishment.

Section 235(2) (for sessions trial) provides that if the accused is convicted, the Judge shall, unless he proceeds in accordance with the provisions of section 360, hear the accused on the question of sentence, and then pass sentence on him according to law.

Section 248(2) (for warrant trial) provides that where, the Magistrate finds the accused guilty, but does not proceed in accordance with the provisions of section 325 or section 360, he shall, after hearing the accused on the question of sentence, pass sentence upon him according to law.

However when the sentence is pronounced in a summons case, the parties need not argue on the amount of punishment given. The sentence is the sole discretion of the judge.

24. Judgment of Court passing sentence:- After the arguments on sentence, the court finally decides what should be the punishment for the accused. While punishing a person, the courts consider various theories of punishment like reformative theory of punishment and deterrent theory of punishment. Court also considers the age, background and history of an accused and the judgment is pronounced accordingly.

Judgement shall be pronounced in accordance with chapter 28 of Cr.P.C.(dealing with judgement)

C. Post-trial stage

25. Appeal (within specified period of limitation) Or Revision :-

Appeal :- Appeal (Chapter 29) can be filed by party aggrieved by judgment on acquittal (section 378)/ conviction (section 374)/sentence (section 377).

On notice being issued to the opposite parties, arguments are placed before Appellate court by defence counsel and the public prosecutor.

Powers of the Appeallate Court - Under section 386 the Appeallate Court has following powers –

1. In an appeal from an order or acquittal - reverse such order and direct that further inquiry be made, or that the accused be re- tried or committed for trial, as the case may be, or find him guilty and pass sentence on him according to law;



2. In an appeal from a conviction-

a. reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused, or order him to be re- tried by a Court of competent jurisdiction subordinate to such Appellate Court or committed for trial, or
b. alter the finding, maintaining the sentence, or
c. with or without altering the finding, alter the nature or the extent, or the nature and extent, of the sentence, but not so as to enhance the Same;

3. In an appeal for enhancement of sentence -
a. reverse the finding and sentence and acquit or discharge the accused or order him to be re- tried by a Court competent to try the offence, or
b. alter the finding maintaining the sentence, or
c. with or without altering the finding, alter the nature or the extent, or the nature and extent, of the sentence, so as to enhance or reduce the same;

4. In an appeal from any other order, alter or reverse such order;

5. Make any amendment or any consequential or incidental order that may be just or proper; 

Provided that the Appellate Court shall not inflict greater punishment for the offence which in its opinion the accused has committed, than might have been inflicted for that offence by the Court passing the order or sentence under appeal.

Or,

Revision (Chapter 30) :-

Power of revision under Cr.P.C. lies with the High Court and the Court of sessions.

In a court case, the provision of appeal to the higher court is inbuilt in law. An aggrieved litigant can redress his grievance by exercising that provision. But in some cases there is no provision for appeal at all. 

Even if appeal is there, there is only one appeal in some cases. In some other cases the appeal provision may not be holistic enough to address every sort of grievance of the litigant. Therefore in order to avoid the remote possibility of any miscarriage of justice there is a provision for revision.

Power of revision is exercisable to any pending or concluded proceeding.

The High Court or Sessions Judge can direct the Chief Judicial Magistrate or any Magistrate to conduct further inquiry into any complaint dismissed under section 203 for having no sufficient ground, or under section 204 (4) for not paying process fee for issuing process, or the discharge of any person accused of any offence under the CrP.C.

While carrying out revision, the High Court or Sessions Judge may exercise all the powers conferred on a Court of Appeal under Sections 386, 389, 390 and 391 of the CrPC, or on a Court of Sessions under Section 307 of CrPC.

A court exercising revision, unlike as in an appeal, cannot convert the acquittal into one of conviction.

26. Judgment of the Appellate Court or Court having revisional jurisdiction.




27. When the Court of Session passes a sentence of death, the proceedings shall be submitted to the High Court, and the sentence shall not be executed unless it is confirmed by the High Court. (Section 366). 

According to section 368
  " In any case submitted under section 366, the High Court-

1. may confirm the sentence, or pass any other sentence warranted by law, or 

2. may annul the conviction, and convict the accused of any offence of which the Court of Session might have convicted him, or order a new trial on the same or an amended charge, or 

3. may acquit the accused person: 

Provided that no order of confirmation shall be made under this section until the period allowed for preferring an appeal has expired, or, if an appeal is presented within such period, until such appeal is disposed of.

28. Execution, Suspension, Remission and commutation of sentences : -  

Chapter 32 of Cr.P.C. deals with Execution, Suspension, Remission and commutation of sentences.

Execution of Sentence :-

Execution of Death sentence - Section 413 provides that when in a case submitted to the High Court for the confirmation of a death sentence, or when a death sentence is passed by the high court in appeal or revision, the Court of Session receives the order of confirmation or other order of the High Court thereon, , it shall cause such order to be carried into effect by issuing a warrant or taking such other steps as may be necessary. 

Execution of sentence of imprisonment -
 Section 418 provides that  Where the accused is sentenced to imprisonment for life or to imprisonment for any term the Court passing the sentence shall forthwith forward a warrant to the jail or other place in which he is, or is to be, confined, and, unless the accused is already confined in such jail or other place, shall forward him to such jail or other place, with the warrant.

Section 419 provides that Every warrant for the execution of a sentence of imprisonment shall be directed to the officer in charge of the jail or other place in which the prisoner is, or is to be, confined.

Execution of fine -
 When an offender has been sentenced to pay a fine the Court passing the sentence may take action for the recovery of the fine in either or both of the following ways, that is to say, it may 

a. issue a warrant
 for the levy of the amount by attachment and sale of any moveable property belonging to the offender; 

b. issue a warrant
 to the collector of the district, authorising him to realise the amount as arrears of land revenue from the movable or immovable property, or both of the defaulter:


Suspension , Remission and Commutation of Sentence

Suspension means to take or withdraw the sentence for the time being. After a person is found guilty, the execution is stayed for a temporary period in suspension. It is the temporary postponement of the sentence. 

Remission implies reducing the period of sentence without changing its character. 

Commutation denotes the substitution of a form of punishment for a lighter one.

The power of suspension, remission and commutation of sentence is vestesd with the appropriate government. 

If the accused has undergone any detention during the period of investigation inquiry or trial of the same case then while convicting him, a set off can be given under section 428 of Cr.P.C.




References :-

1.https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/blog.ipleaders.in/all-about-the-various-stages-of-criminal-trial-in-india/amp/

2.https://www.lawfarm.in/blogs/process-of-criminal-trial-and-proceedings-in-india.

3.http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/mobile/experts/details.asp?mod_id=84286








Share:

Everything You Need To Know About ZERO FIR Or Free Jurisdiction FIR - Online Legal Advise

Everything You Need To Know About ZERO FIR Or Free Jurisdiction FIR  - Online Legal Advise


To understand ZERO FIR, First it is necessary to understand what does an FIR mean.

What is FIR ?

A First Information Report (F.I.R.) is the first information in point of time regarding the commission of a cognizable offence that is given to the police and is recorded in the manner provided under section 154 of the Cr.P.C.

It is generally a complaint lodged with the police by the victim of a cognizable
offence or by someone on his or her behalf, but anyone can make such a report either orally or in writing to the police.


By whom FIR can be filled ?

Any person who has knowledge about the commission of a cognizable offence may register an F.I.R. with the police. Such person may be:

1. The victim of the offence, or
2. a family member of the victim, or
3. a witness to the offence, or
4. the person who has committed the offence, or
5. a police officer, or
6. any other person who has come to know about such offence.

An F.I.R. may also be registered under the order of a Magistrate. For example, if any woman files a complaint before the Magistrate that her husband is harassing her for dowry. If the Magistrate forwards the complaint to the officer-in-charge of the concerned police station without taking cognizance, then the officer should register an F.I.R. and then investigate the case (Cr.P.C. section 156 (3)).

Contents of FIR

Every FIR has serial no, date of occurrence, time of occurrence, place of occurrence, contents of complaint etc. and it is lodged because of commission of cognizable offence (an offence in which police can take suo motu action and no prior approval from court is required). 

Every police station has jurisdictional area for which they can take up the investigation if commission of cognizable offence area found under their jurisdiction. For example,  if someone's phone is theft at Bus stand of LalQuila , Delhi then the police station whose under LalQuila come will lodge such persons FIR and investigate it.

What is ZERO FIR ?

The concept of Zero FIR is a free jurisdiction FIR. The provision of Zero FIR came up as a recommendation in Justice Verma Committee Report in the new Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 after the heinous Nirbhaya case of December 2012. The provision says:

" A FIR can be filed at any police station irrespective of place of crime and area of jurisdiction. This provision is for everyone. When in trouble Men and women will be benefited equally. "

In Zero FIR, any police station can register FIR irrespective of jurisdictional area but the investigation will be taken up the police in which place of occurrence reported in FIR. The police station registers the zero FIR marking it serial no. zero and transfer to the competent jurisdictional area which can carry out the investigation. The sanctity of legal process remains same in Zero FIR.

It is very helpful for people as it facilitate them by not allowing making rounds of different police station for lodging the FIR.

A Zero FIR can be filed in any police station by the victim, irrespective of their residence or crime place. Even if you are away from the place of incident or are unaware of the right jurisdiction, you can successfully file an FIR in any police
station. This type of FIR is termed as a Zero FIR.

What can be done if police refuses to file ZERO FIR ?

In many cases it happens that the police officers deny to acknowledge a Zero FIR and also try to convince the victim and his family to approach the concerned police station for registering the FIR rather than trying to help them.

Many of us do not know that according to Section 166A of the Indian Penal Code added by Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013, a police officer refusing to register FIRs related to certain offences against women (such as rape, molestation, etc.) can be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with a fine or with both.


A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Govt.of UP and Others (2008) 7 SCC 164 has issued the following guidelines:-

a) The registration of FIR is mandatory under section 154 of CrPC, if the information discloses commission of a cognizance offence.

b) The police officer cannot avoid his duty of registering offence if cognizable offence is disclosed. Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

c) Action must be taken against erring officers who do not register the FIR if information received by him discloses a cognizable offence.

The Supreme Court in Bimla Rawal and Others Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Another 2008 II AD Delhi 188 has held:-

“It is clear that the law is that police can register an FIR of commission of a cognizable crime but after registration of FIR, if on scrutiny or investigation, it is found that crime was not committed within the jurisdiction of that Police Station but was committed within the jurisdiction of some other Police Station, the FIR should be transferred to that Police Station."

" However, if at the time of registration of FIR itself, it is apparent on the face of it that crime was committed outside the jurisdiction of the Police Station, the Police after registration of FIR should transfer the FIR to that Police Station for investigation. Normally a ‘Zero’ FIR is registered by Police in such cases and after registration of FIR, the FIR is transferred to the concerned Police Station.”


How to File a ZERO FIR ?

1. Like all regular FIRs, a Zero FIR can be filed in accordance to the below mentioned procedure. 

2. Statement will be recorded by the police officer in writing.

3. All details, without any speculation or assumption should be provided to the police during the statement.

4. Make the statement official by signing the register.

5. Get a copy of your complaint and ask for the identification number or Roll is not provided. 

When to use a ZERO FIR ?

The main idea of a Zero FIR is to initiate the investigation or urge the police to take their initial action. Once you have lodged a Zero FIR, make sure that your complaint is not transferred to the appropriate police station in your jurisdiction without any initial action or investigation. Crimes like murder, rape and accidents require immediate action from the concerned police authorities so that they take appropriate samples, eye witnesses and other circumstantial details. Zero FIR allows the authorities to pen down the initial action taken rather than trying to figure out what had happened at the crime scene initially. 

Important Case laws on ZERO FIR

In the case of Satvinder Kaur vs. State (Government of NCT Delhi), The complainant had appealed in the Supreme Court against the order of the High Court, where the High Court had quashed the FIR filed at Delhi Police Station by the complainant. The Supreme Court held that, Police can investigate the case, which does not fall under their jurisdiction.

In the case of Bimla Rawal and Ors.v State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr 2008 II AD Delhi 188, FIR was lodged in Delhi, despite the fact that all incidents occurred in Mumbai. Writ Petition was filed in Supreme Court regarding the mala fide intentions of police succumbing under the pressure of opposite. 

Impact of ZERO FIR

A famous example of Zero FIR is Aasaram Bapu rape case. In the FIR, the place of occurence of offence falls under the jurisdiction of Jodhpur, Rajasthan but the Police Station Kamla Market, Delhi registered the FIR, then transferred it to Jodhpur, for further investigation. Then Jodhpur police taken up the investigation.


References :

1.https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.droitpenaleiljcc.in/PDF/V1I1/10.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjJ58uJ-arbAhUVfn0KHfsUA1kQFjAAegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw23_bIDVb9wDI37MQAqek_o


Share:

Whether Six Months Waiting Period In Section 13B(2) Of Hindu Marriage Act For Divorce By Mutual Consent is Mandatory ? Detailed Discussion With Landmark Judgements

Whether Six Months Waiting Period In Section 13B(2) Of Hindu Marriage Act For Divorce By Mutual Consent is Mandatory ? Detailed Discussion With Landmark Judgements


In this article we will discuss:

1. Whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act) for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or can be relaxed in any exceptional situations ? and

2. Whether exercise of power under Article 142 to waive the statutory period under Section 13B of the Act was appropriate ?



To answer these questions it is necessary to cite the provision of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

“13-B. Divorce by mutual consent -  (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976, on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.

(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred  to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of the decree.”

Now, Regarding the first question it can be said that it is now well settled that the waiting period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations.

This view is supported by judgments of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in K. Omprakash vs. K. Nalini AIR 1986 AP 167, Karnataka High Court in Roopa Reddy vs. Prabhakar Reddy AIR 1994 Kar 12, Delhi High Court in Dhanjit Vadra vs. Smt. Beena Vadra AIR 1990 Del 146 and Madhya Pradesh High Court in Dinesh Kumar Shukla vs. Smt. Neeta AIR 2005 MP 106

The Supreme Court in a very recent case  (Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11158 OF 2017) considered the above question in detail and held that the period mentioned in Section 13B(2) is not mandatory but directory and it will be open to the Court to exercise its discretion in the facts and circumstances of each case where there is no possibility of parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation.

In this case the Supreme Court observed that

" The object of the provision is to enable the parties to dissolve a marriage by consent if the marriage has irretrievably broken down and to enable them to rehabilitate them as per available options."

" The object of the cooling off the period was to safeguard against a hurried decision if there was otherwise possibility of differences being reconciled."

" The object was not to perpetuate a purposeless marriage or to prolong the agony of the parties when there was no chance of reconciliation. Though every effort has to be made to save a marriage, if there are no chances of reunion and there are chances of fresh rehabilitation, the Court should not be powerless in enabling the parties to have a better option."



On the basis of its observation the Supreme Court issued following guidelines in this regard :

" where the Court dealing with a matter is satisfied that a case is made out to waive the statutory period under Section 13B(2), it can do so after considering the following :

1. the statutory period of six months specified in Section 13B(2), in addition to the statutory period of one year under Section 13B(1) of separation of parties is already over before the first motion itself;

2. all efforts for mediation/conciliation including efforts in terms of Order XXXIIA Rule 3 CPC/Section 23(2) of the Act/Section 9 of the Family Courts Act to reunite the parties have failed and there is no likelihood of success in that direction by any further efforts;

3. the parties have genuinely settled their differences including alimony, custody of child or any other pending issues between the parties;

4. the waiting period will only prolong their agony.

The waiver application can be filed one week after the first motion giving reasons for the prayer for waiver.

If the above conditions are satisfied, the waiver of the waiting period for the second motion will be in the discretion of the concerned Court. "

Thus cooling off period enshrined under Section 13(B)2 of the Act is directory and can be waived by the court where proceedings are pending, in exceptional situations.

Now regarding the second question i.e., whether exercise of power under Article 142 to waive the statutory period under Section 13B of the Act was appropriate ? There is controversy in the judgements of the Supreme Court itself

In Anjana Kishore versus Puneet Kishore (2002) 10 SCC 194 the Supreme Court was dealing with a transfer petition and the parties reached a settlement. The Court waived the six months period under Article 142 in the facts and circumstances of the case.

In Romesh Chander v. Savitri (1995)2 SCC 7; Kiran v. Sharad Dutt (2000)10 SCC 243; Sanghamitra Ghosh v. Kajal Kumar Ghosh (2007) 2 SCC 220; Rishikesh Sharma v. Saroj Sharma (2007) 2 SCC 263; Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh (2007) 4 SCC 511 and Satish Sitole v. Ganga (2008) 7 SCC 73 The Supreme Court held that power under Article 142 had been exercised in cases where the Court found the marriage to be totally unworkable, emotionally dead, beyond salvage and broken down irretrievably. This power was also exercised to put quietus to all litigations and to save the parties from further agony. This view was reiterated in Poonam versus Sumit Tanwar (2010) 4 SCC 460.


However in Manish Goel versus Rohini Goel (2010) 4 SCC 393, a Bench of two-Judges of Supreme Court held that jurisdiction of this Court under Article 142 could not be used to waive the statutory period of six months for filing the second motion under Section 13B, as doing so will be passing an order in contravention of a statutory provision.



But without any reference to the judgment in Manish Goel,  power under Article 142 of the Constitution has been exercised by the Supreme Court in number of cases, even after the said judgment.(Priyanka Khanna v. Amit Khanna (2011) 15 SCC 612; Devinder Singh Narula v. Meenakshi Nangia (2012) 8 SCC 580; Vimi Vinod Chopra v. Vinod Gulshan Chpra (2013) 15 SCC 547; Priyanka Chawla v. Amit Chawla (2016) 3 SCC 126; Nikhil Kumar v. Rupali Kumar (2016) 13 SCC 383)

This controversy is resolved by the Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11158 OF 2017) wherein the Supreme Court held that

 " we are of the view that since Manish Goel holds the field, in absence of contrary decision by a larger Bench, power under Article 142 of the Constitution cannot be exercised contrary to the statutory provisions, especially when no proceedings are pending before this Court and this Court is approached only for the purpose of waiver of the statute."

Answer of both the questions is thus given.


Share:

Multiple Khoj

Search This Blog

Popular Posts

Labels

Like Our Facebook Page

Recent Posts